How to Use

Basic Information

Georgetown has a license with, a web-based service that, among other things, is able to sniff out possible plagiarism in student work. Once faculty members have set up their accounts, students and faculty can electronically submit essays to a digital dropbox. Turnitin then automatically searches the essay for passages found on the Internet (including pages no longer online), in the ProQuest Research Library, and in all papers previously submitted by users at any member school.

The Honor Council highly recommends that faculty members make regular use of this service. We believe that when applied to all essays submitted in a class, this technology can be a powerful tool to educate and to deter.  There are additional features and tools Turnitin has developed regarding grading, peer review, etc.  Faculty are encouraged to explore all the Turnitin features.

How to Get Started

Getting started is easy! but the steps to establish a “native”(stand-alone) account have changed.  Faculty who wish to sign up only have to send an email (to or  The Honor Council will submit the name and email address to Turnitin, which will send an email back to the faculty user with instructions about setting up an account.

HOWEVER…the “Ed-Tech” team from UIS, which assists faculty and students with educational technology, advises that faculty who use either the Canvas or Blackboard learning management systems, instead use the portal available in Canvas or Blackboard to set up Turnitin for their students. NB:  Remember that Blackboard is being phased out and will not be available at the end of Fall 2019 (December 2019).

Here are “how to” instructions from the EdTech/UIS team.

Turnitin can be used both in Blackboard and Canvas.  Please find step-by-step instructions on how to create Turnitin assignments on either platform:

Turnitin in Canvas:

Turnitin in Blackboard:

Suggestions for Using

  1. For fairness reasons, the Honor Council recommends that faculty using should submit all students’ papers in a course instead of only problematic papers.
  2. An important part of Georgetown University’s agreement with is that the course syllabus for each course intending to utilize must carry a notice to students substantially similar to the following:
    • Students agree that by taking this course all required papers may be subject to submission for a Textual Similarity Review to for the detection of plagiarism. All submitted papers will be added as source documents in the reference database solely for the purpose of detecting plagiarism of such papers in the future. Use of the service is subject to the terms of use agreement posted on the site.
  3. If use of is instituted after distribution of the syllabus, then the faculty and Georgetown shall use reasonable efforts to ensure that equivalent written notice is provided by the instructor to the students; and students should also be aware that if they object to participating in, faculty may use an “off-line option” requirement, such as: (i) a short reflection paper on research methodology; (ii) a draft bibliography prior to submission of the final paper; and/or (iii) the cover page and first cited page of each reference source to be photocopied and submitted with the final paper.
  4.’s Originality reports are only the means for detecting textual similarities between compared works and do not determine conclusively the existence of plagiarism. When similarities are found in a paper, faculty must check the student’s paper to ascertain whether such textual similarities are properly referenced.
  5. An Originality Report is a confidential document, and any disclosure by the faculty member or the Honor Council to any third party is at the Institution’s own risk.
  6. All papers submitted to by Georgetown University and/or its instructors and students shall be retained in the source database solely for the purpose of using such papers as source material to prevent plagiarism of such papers, except as expressly authorized by students and/or instructors. There is a provision in the agreement that will let the University “take down” any paper from the database if so requested by a student or faculty member. However, removal of papers could decrease the usefulness of the database in the future.

Georgetown Faculty Testimonials

“When I get a first-rate paper in my Shakespeare class (and I shudder to think at how many Shakespeare essays are available to students), my happiness is undiluted by suspicion. I can concentrate on the paper itself and on my comments instead of wasting energy obsessing about the provenance of its form and content. In the very rare instance of plagiarism, did all the work, in one case revealing not only the plagiarist but the supplier, a student from that class in a previous year.”
Jason Rosenblatt, English Department

“ is a professional operation, and it helped my students to avoid deliberate AND accidental plagiarism. Many students take notes without distinguishing between verbatim notes and their own words. Often students “massage” extended notes into prose, without realizing how close they are to the original sources. Turnitin helps to detect this problem during midterm papers, which made it possible to correct the student’s approach for all future written products.”
Kai-Henrik Barth, Security Studies Program

“I use it for the larger classes where plagiarism or losing a paper is more of a concern. […] I have a paperless grading process where I download papers, use Microsoft Word’s reviewing tools to mark up the paper, and email back the paper in Word and PDF format. […] If they [faculty] want the deterrent effect, they need to tell the students about what does.”
Alexander Pruss, Philosophy Department

News Articles  (actually, not “news” but “old” articles; this section will be updated soon)

  • Aditi Banga, “Fighting Plagiarism, Schools Go High-Tech.” The Harvard Crimson 4 May 2006. The Georgetown Honor Council gives their opinions on the website.
  • Jennifer Nycz-Conner, “Put the Pinch on Plagiarism.” Washington Business Journal 20 January 2006. Nice overview of the program, featuring Honor Council Executive Director, Sonia Jacobson.
  • Robb Murray, “Those Pesky Plagiarists.” The Free Press 8 May, 2006. Includes a long conversation with a professor at Minnesota State University.
  • Want more? Try heading to and searching the news for turnitin. You might be surprised at how hot a topic this is.